Profiling Cas9‐ and Cas12a‐induced mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana

Abstract

SUMMARYWith the advancement of CRISPR technologies, a comprehensive understanding of repair mechanisms following double‐strand break (DSB) formation is important for improving the precision and efficiency of genetic modifications. In plant genetics, two Cas nucleases are widely used, i.e. Cas9 and Cas12a, which differ with respect to PAM sequence composition, position of the DSB relative to the PAM, and DSB‐end configuration (blunt vs. staggered). The latter difference has led to speculations about different options for repair and recombination. Here, we provide detailed repair profiles for LbCas12a in Arabidopsis thaliana, using identical experimental settings previously reported for Cas9‐induced DSBs, thus allowing for a quantitative comparison of both nucleases. For both enzymes, non‐homologous end‐joining (NHEJ) produces 70% of mutations, whereas polymerase theta‐mediated end‐joining (TMEJ) generates 30%, indicating that DSB‐end configuration does not dictate repair pathway choice. Relevant for genome engineering approaches aimed at integrating exogenous DNA, we found that Cas12a similarly stimulates the integration of T‐DNA molecules as does Cas9. Long‐read sequencing of both Cas9 and Cas12a repair outcomes further revealed a previously underappreciated degree of DNA loss upon TMEJ. The most notable disparity between Cas9 and Cas12a repair profiles is caused by how NHEJ acts on DSB ends with short overhangs: non‐symmetric Cas9 cleavage produce 1 bp insertions, which we here show to depend on polymerase Lambda, whereas staggered Cas12a DSBs are not subjected to fill‐in synthesis. We conclude that Cas9 and Cas12a are equally effective for genome engineering purposes, offering flexibility in nuclease choice based on the availability of compatible PAM sequences.