Reassessing the alternative ecosystem states proposition in the African savanna‐forest domain

Author:

Higgins Steven I.1ORCID,Banerjee Swarnendu23ORCID,Baudena Mara45ORCID,Bowman David M. J. S.6ORCID,Conradi Timo1ORCID,Couteron Pierre7ORCID,Kruger Laurence M.8ORCID,O'Hara Robert B.9ORCID,Williamson Grant J.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Plant Ecology University of Bayreuth Universitätsstraße 30 95447 Bayreuth Germany

2. Dutch Institute for Emergent Phenomena, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics University of Amsterdam PO Box 94240 1090 GE Amsterdam the Netherlands

3. Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University 3508 TC Utrecht the Netherlands

4. National Research Council, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (CNR‐ISAC) 10133 Torino Italy

5. National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC) 90133 Palermo Italy

6. Fire, Centre, School of Natural Sciences University of Tasmania 7005 Sandy Bay Hobart Tas. Australia

7. AMAP, University of Montpellier, IRD, CNRS, INRAE, CIRAD 34394 Montpellier France

8. Organization for Tropical Studies PO Box 33 Skukuza 1350 South Africa

9. Department of Mathematical Sciences Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim N‐7491 Norway

Abstract

SummaryEcologists are being challenged to predict how ecosystems will respond to climate changes. According to the Multi‐Colored World (MCW) hypothesis, climate impacts may not manifest because consumers such as fire and herbivory can override the influence of climate on ecosystem state. One MCW interpretation is that climate determinism fails because alternative ecosystem states (AES) are possible at some locations in climate space. We evaluated theoretical and empirical evidence for the proposition that forest and savanna are AES in Africa. We found that maps which infer where AES zones are located were contradictory. Moreover, data from longitudinal and experimental studies provide inconclusive evidence for AES. That is, although the forest‐savanna AES proposition is theoretically sound, the existing evidence is not yet convincing. We conclude by making the case that the AES proposition has such fundamental consequences for designing management actions to mitigate and adapt to climate change in the savanna‐forest domain that it needs a more robust evidence base before it is used to prescribe management actions.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3