Cam or professor Lee? How instructor seniority and address term influence student perceptions in the United States

Author:

Wu Ru1ORCID,Gardner Mary Jane1,Todd Patricia R.1

Affiliation:

1. Western Kentucky University Bowling Green Kentucky USA

Abstract

AbstractIn this research, we explore the effect of college instructors' use of formal versus casual titles on student perceptions as a function of the instructors' academic ranks. We conducted two studies: the first surveying students to study their expectations and preferences of formality and rank, and the second using experimental manipulations of title formality and instructor rank to examine the effects on student perceptions of instructors and their classes. Our data indicate that a full professor is perceived more favourably than a graduate assistant when using a casual title (their first name). Conversely, the pattern goes the opposite when they use a formal title. These insights were assessed through course favourability and enrolment intention and were rooted in two fundamental individual traits: competence and approachableness. In addition, the effects are less pronounced for students with previous exposure to the course content, suggesting course experience as a moderator. This study offers guidance on student–instructor interactions and provides insights for educators in presenting themselves through different titles.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference65 articles.

1. Cultivating admiration in brands: Warmth, competence, and landing in the “golden quadrant”;Aaker J. L.;Journal of Consumer Psychology,2012

2. Students' stereotypes of professors: An exploration of the double violations of ethnicity and gender;Anderson K. J.;Social Psychology of Education,2010

3. The impact of instructor attire on college student satisfaction;Carr D. L.;College Student Journal,2010

4. Chen C. F. E.(2001).Making e‐mail requests to professors: Taiwanese vs. American students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics St. Louis MS.

5. How naive theories drive opposing inferences from the same information;Deval H.;Journal of Consumer Research,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3