Affiliation:
1. California State University Fullerton California USA
2. California State University Northridge California USA
3. University of Nevada Las Vegas Nevada USA
4. Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA
Abstract
AbstractInstead of being agents of inquiry and change, Southeast Asian American (SEAA; Viet, Hmong, Lao, Cambodian) refugee subjects are often objectified and essentialized by researchers in the social sciences. In this article, we document our collaborative journeys to unlearn colonial and racist ways of thinking about and conducting research on marginalized communities, including our own SEAA communities. Specifically, we present participatory action research (PAR) and testimonios—two examples of counter‐storytelling—as promising critical race methodologies. Using PAR, our team of academic researchers and participant‐researchers collaborated on research to create change in our communities. To assess our experiences with PAR, we used testimonios to share our self‐reflections and stories on the research process and the training relationship. We end by offering suggestions for using PAR and testimonios to engage in anti‐colonial and anti‐racist research.
Reference69 articles.
1. American Psychological Association APA Task Force on Inequities in Academic Tenure and Promotion. (2023)APA Task Force Report on Promotion Tenure and Retention of Faculty of Color in Psychology. Retrieved fromhttps://www.apa.org/pubs/reports/inequities‐academic‐tenure‐promotion.pdf
2. Associated Press. (2021 October 20).NFL agrees to end race‐based brain testing in $1B settlement on concussions.NPR. Retrieved fromhttps://www.npr.org/2021/10/20/1047793751/nfl‐concussion‐settlement‐race‐norming‐cte
3. Participatory action research
4. Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma
5. Power and perceived influence: I caused your behavior, but I'm not responsible for it
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献