An Examination of Common Sensitivity Review Practices in Test Development-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An Examination of Common Sensitivity Review Practices in Test Development

Published:2014-02-18 Issue:1 Volume:22 Page:1-11
ISSN:0965-075X
Container-title:International Journal of Selection and Assessment
language:en
Short-container-title:Int J Select Assess

Author:

Golubovich Juliya¹,Grand James A.²,Ryan Ann Marie¹,Schmitt Neal¹

Affiliation:

1. Michigan State University; Room 348, Psychology Building, 316 Physics Rd East Lansing MI 48824 USA

2. The University of Akron; Akron OH USA

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Psychology,Applied Psychology,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference36 articles.

1. Becker , D. S. Wise , L. L. Hardoin , M. M. Watters , C. 2011 Independent evaluation of the California High School exit examination: 2011 evaluation report

2. Broer , M. Lee , Y. W. Rizavi , S. Powers , D. 2005 Ensuring the fairness of GRE writing prompts: Assessing differential difficulty

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How Serious are We About Fairness in Testing and How Far are We Willing to Go? A Response to Randall and Bennett with Reflections About the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing;Educational Assessment;2023-04-03

2. It Ain’t Near ‘Bout Fair: Re-Envisioning the Bias and Sensitivity Review Process from a Justice-Oriented Antiracist Perspective;Educational Assessment;2023-04-03

3. Personnel selection: A review of ways to maximize validity, diversity, and the applicant experience;Personnel Psychology;2023-03

4. Culture as a determinant of option choice in a situational judgement test: A new look;Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology;2018-12-19

5. Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures;Industrial and Organizational Psychology;2018-12