Assessment of circulating insulin using liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry during insulin glargine treatment in type 2 diabetes: Implications for estimating insulin sensitivity and β‐cell function

Author:

Seegmiller Jesse C.1ORCID,Schmit David J.1,Arends Valerie L.1,Steffes Michael W.1ORCID,Kahn Steven E.2ORCID,Younes Naji3ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Advanced Research and Diagnostic Laboratory University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA

2. Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition VA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

3. The Biostatistics Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health The George Washington University Rockville Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractAimTo determine the potential impact of the cross‐reactivity of insulin glargine U‐100 and its metabolites on insulin sensitivity and β‐cell measures in people with type 2 diabetes.Materials and MethodsUsing liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), we measured concentrations of endogenous insulin, glargine and its two metabolites (M1 and M2) in fasting and oral glucose tolerance test‐stimulated plasma from 19 participants and fasting specimens from another 97 participants 12 months after randomization to receive the insulin glargine. The last dose of glargine was administered before 10:00 PM the night before testing. Insulin was also measured on these specimens using an immunoassay. We used fasting specimens to calculate insulin sensitivity (Homeostatic Model Assessment 2 [HOMA2]‐S%; QUICKI index; PREDIM index) and β‐cell function (HOMA2‐B%). Using specimens following glucose ingestion, we calculated insulin sensitivity (Matsuda ISI[comp] index) and β‐cell response (insulinogenic index [IGI], and total incremental insulin response [iAUC] insulin/glucose).ResultsIn plasma, glargine was metabolized to form the M1 and M2 metabolites that were quantifiable by LC–MS; however, the analogue and its metabolites cross‐reacted by less than 100% in the insulin immunoassay. This incomplete cross‐reactivity resulted in a systematic bias of fasting‐based measures. By contrast, because M1 and M2 did not change following glucose ingestion, a bias was not observed for IGI and iAUC insulin/glucose.ConclusionsDespite glargine metabolites being detected in the insulin immunoassay, dynamic insulin responses can be used to assess β‐cell responsiveness. However, given the cross‐reactivity of the glargine metabolites in the insulin immunoassay, fasting‐based measures of insulin sensitivity and β‐cell function are biased.

Funder

American Diabetes Association

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3