Report of the American Diabetes Association's Task Force on Standardization of the Insulin Assay

Author:

Robbins David C1,Andersen Lennart2,Bowsher Ron3,Chance Ron3,Dinesen Bo4,Frank Bruce3,Gingerich Ron5,Goldstein David6,Widemeyer Hsaio-Mei6,Haffner Steven7,Hales C Nick8,Jarett Leonard9,Polonsky Kenneth10,Porte Daniel11,Skyler Jay12,Webb George11,Gallagher Kathy21

Affiliation:

1. Penn Medical Laboratory, Medlantic Research Institute Washington, DC

2. Novo Nordisk Laboratories, Novo Nordisk A/S Bagsvaerd

3. Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly Indianapolis, Indiana

4. Steno Diabetes Center Gentofte, Denmark

5. Linco Research St. Louis, Missouri

6. Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri Columbia

7. University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, Texas

8. Cambridge University Cambridge, U.K.

9. Department of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

10. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Hospital and Clinics Chicago, Illinois

11. Department of Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Washington

12. Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miami, Florida

Abstract

Recent large-scale epidemiological studies demonstrate that blood concentrations of immunoreactive insulin predict the development of NIDDM and IDDM and are associated with the risk of several degenerative diseases, such as coronary and peripheral vessel atherosclerosis, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. The reliability of these measurements is dependent on a biological assay that has not been well standardized between laboratories. Recognizing this, the American Diabetes Association organized a task force to assess comparability of blood insulin measurements between laboratories and to suggest techniques to improve comparability. The task force found that identical serum and plasma samples measured in different laboratories produced widely disparate values that were unacceptable for population comparisons. Use of a single reference standard did little to improve comparability. Assay characteristics such as linearity, recovery, accuracy, and cross-reactivity to proinsulin and its primary conversion intermediates varied among the laboratories, and they did not readily explain differences in the measurements made from assay to assay. Use of the same assay kit in different laboratories did not always ensure comparable measurements. Linear regression of assay results from one laboratory to an arbitrarily chosen reference assay greatly improved comparability and demonstrated the potential value in comparing each assay to a reference method. The task force report defines acceptable assay characteristics and proposes a three-step process of insulin assay proficiency and comparability. A central reference assay and ongoing sample exchange will be needed to allow reliable comparisons of insulin measurements made in different laboratories. Rigorous quality control and continuous quality improvement are needed to maintain reliability of the insulin measurement.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3