Digital Evaluation of Three Splinting Materials Used to Fabricate Verification Jigs for Full-Arch Implant Prostheses: A Comparative Study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Digital Evaluation of Three Splinting Materials Used to Fabricate Verification Jigs for Full-Arch Implant Prostheses: A Comparative Study

Published:2016-10-21 Issue:2 Volume:29 Page:102-109
ISSN:1496-4155
Container-title:Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
language:en
Short-container-title:J Esthet Restor Dent

Author:

Papaspyridakos Panos¹,Kim Yong-Jeong²,Finkelman Matthew³,El-Rafie Khaled⁴,Weber Hans-Peter⁵

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor, Division of Postgraduate Prosthodontics, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics; Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester; Rochester NY USA

2. Assistant Professor, Division of Postgraduate Prosthodontics; Tufts University School of Dental Medicine; Boston MA USA

3. Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health and Community Service; Tufts University School of Dental Medicine; Boston MA USA

4. Clinical Instructor, Division of Postgraduate Prosthodontics; Tufts University School of Dental Medicine; Boston MA USA

5. Professor and Chair, Division of Postgraduate Prosthodontics; Tufts University School of Dental Medicine; Boston MA USA

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/jerd.12274/fullpdf

Reference23 articles.

1. 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients;Buser;Clin Implant Dent Relat Res,2012

2. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up;Malo;J Am Dent Assoc,2011

3. In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between “virtual” and “physical” assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements;Jemt;Clin Implant Dent Relat Res,2012

4. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study;Papaspyridakos;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2011

5. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients;Jemt;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1996

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparative evaluation of open tray impression technique: investigating the precision of four splinting materials in multiple implants;BMC Oral Health;2023-11-08

2. Effect of primary versus secondary splinting impression techniques on the passive fit of screw-retained implant prosthesis: a randomized clinical trial;Bulletin of the National Research Centre;2023-11-07

3. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study;Journal of Dentistry;2023-08

4. Comparative accuracy of implant impression techniques with different splinting materials;Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science;2023-03-31

5. The effect of different implant impression splinting techniques and time on the dimensional accuracy: An in vitro study;Journal of Dentistry;2022-11