Whose intentions? What consequences? Interrogating “Intended Consequences” for conservation with environmental biotechnology-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Whose intentions? What consequences? Interrogating “Intended Consequences” for conservation with environmental biotechnology

Published:2021-04 Issue:4 Volume:3 Page:
ISSN:2578-4854
Container-title:Conservation Science and Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:Conservat Sci and Prac

Author:

Barnhill‐Dilling S. Kathleen¹^ORCID,Delborne Jason A.

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/csp2.406

Reference51 articles.

1. Australian Academy of Science. (2017).Synthetic gene drives in Australia: implications of emerging technologies. Australian Academy of Science.https://www.science.org.au/support/analysis/reports/synthetic‐gene‐drives‐australia‐implications‐emerging‐technologies.

2. The genetically engineered American chestnut tree as opportunity for reciprocal restoration in Haudenosaunee communities

3. Rooted in Recognition: Indigenous Environmental Justice and the Genetically Engineered American Chestnut Tree

4. Conservation science and the ethos of restraint

5. Brown K.V.(2016 September 19).Genetically engineered mosquitoes could wipe out the world's most deadly viruses. If we let them.Splinter News. Retrieved fromhttps://splinternews.com/genetically‐modified‐mosquitoes‐could‐wipe‐out‐the‐worl‐1793862023

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Weighing consequences of action and inaction in invasive insect management;One Earth;2024-05

2. Seizing the policy moment in crop biotech regulation: an interdisciplinary response to the Executive Order on biotechnology;Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology;2023-08-07

3. Moving beyond narrow definitions of gene drive: Diverse perspectives and frames enable substantive dialogue among science and humanities teachers in the United States and United Kingdom;Public Understanding of Science;2023-02-06

4. Is Public Engagement in Bioengineering and Synthetic Biology Improving Research Outcomes?;OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology;2023-02-01

5. Governing gene-edited crops: risks, regulations, and responsibilities as perceived by agricultural genomics experts in Canada;Journal of Responsible Innovation;2023-01-02