Is Public Engagement in Bioengineering and Synthetic Biology Improving Research Outcomes?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Is Public Engagement in Bioengineering and Synthetic Biology Improving Research Outcomes?

Published:2023-02-01 Issue:2 Volume:27 Page:47-50
ISSN:1557-8100
Container-title:OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
language:en
Short-container-title:OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology

Author:

Carter Lucy¹²^ORCID,Mankad Aditi¹²,Hobman Elizabeth V.¹²

Affiliation:

1. CSIRO Environment, Brisbane, Australia.

2. CSIRO Advanced Engineering Biology Future Science Platform, Brisbane, Australia.

Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert Inc

Subject

Genetics,Molecular Biology,Molecular Medicine,Biochemistry,Biotechnology

Link

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/omi.2022.0181

Reference21 articles.

1. Whose intentions? What consequences? Interrogating “Intended Consequences” for conservation with environmental biotechnology

2. The Promises and Realities of Integration in Synthetic Biology: A View From Social Science

3. Governing Gene Drive Technologies: A Qualitative Interview Study

4. Gray P, Meek S, Griffiths P, et al. Synthetic Biology in Australia: An Outlook to 2030. Report for the Australian Council of Learned Academies; 2018.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Abundant pleiotropy across neuroimaging modalities identified through a multivariate genome-wide association study;Nature Communications;2024-03-26

2. Engineering biology and climate change mitigation: Policy considerations;Nature Communications;2024-03-26

3. Research on Bioengineering Algorithm based on Dynamic Fuzzy Neural Network;2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Generation Computing, Communication and Networking (SMART GENCON);2023-12-29

4. Public Engagement and Global Governance of Science: Beyond Instrumentalism;OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology;2023-02-01