Affiliation:
1. University of Exeter, UK
2. North Carolina State University, USA
Abstract
Gene drive is an emerging biotechnology with applications in global health, conservation and agriculture. Scientists are preparing for field trials, triggering debate about when and how to release gene-drive organisms. These decisions depend on public understandings of gene drive, which are shaped by language. While some studies on gene drive communication assume the need to persuade publics of expert definitions of gene drive, we highlight the importance of meaning-making in communication and engagement. We conducted focus groups with humanities and science teachers in the United Kingdom and United States to explore how different media framings stimulated discussions of gene drive. We found diversity in the value of these framings for public debate. Interestingly, the definition favoured by gene drive scientists was the least popular among participants. Rather than carefully curating language, we need opportunities for publics to make sense and negotiate the meanings of a technology on their own terms.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Communication
Reference57 articles.
1. Achenbach J (2018) ‘Genedrive’ research to fight diseases can proceed cautiously, U.N. group decides. The Washington Post 2 December. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2018/11/30/gene-drive-research-fight-diseases-can-proceed-cautiously-un-group-decides/
2. Opinion: Standardizing the definition of gene drive
3. A Code of Ethics for Gene Drive Research
4. Avaaz (n.d.) Stop GM on steroids. Available at: https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/gm_on_steroids/ (accessed 4 November 2021).
5. Whose intentions? What consequences? Interrogating “Intended Consequences” for conservation with environmental biotechnology
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献