Author:
Rodrigues D,Landgraf M,Destro M T
Abstract
This study measures the detection performances of two rapid test systems (Listeria Rapid Test ClearviewTMand BaxTMsystem) for the screening of Listeria sp. and Listeria monocytogenes, respectively. A total of 413 samples from different sources (product from (i) different stages of processing, (ii) different environments, and (iii) different food handlers), collected from a chicken nugget processing plant, were analysed by both rapid methods and a cultural method consisting of pre-enrichment, enrichment, and isolation onto selective agars (PALCAM, LPM, and HCLA). Overall, results showed an excellent correlation between data obtained using ClearviewTMand the cultural method, with ClearviewTMpresenting an efficiency of 99%. BaxTMshowed a lower correlation using the cultural method, with an efficiency of 71.1%. The type of sample did not affect the efficiency of ClearviewTM, which varied from 98.1% for product samples to 100% for environmental and food handler samples, while for BaxTMit had a marked influence. Efficiency of BaxTMvaried from as high as 100% for food handlers to 37.9% for product samples.Key words: Listeria, Listeria monocytogenes, ClearviewTM, BaxTM.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Genetics,Molecular Biology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,General Medicine,Immunology,Microbiology
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献