A comparison of methods for estimating activity costs of wild fish populations: more active fish observed to grow slower

Abstract

Activity costs can account for a major proportion of fish energy budgets and may trade off against observed growth rates in wild fish populations. Recent approaches to estimating activity costs in situ have used a contaminant–bioenergetic mass balance modelling approach, allowing for a broader examination of activity costs among populations compared with time-consuming alternative approaches. We report the results of this contaminant–bioenergetic modelling approach to estimating in situ activity costs compared with two alternative independent methods of assessing in situ activity costs. Comparisons were made between a fast- and slow-growing yellow perch (Perca flavescens) population. Contaminant–bioenergetic estimates of activity costs in the fast-growing population were 39% lower than those in the slow-growing population. Activity estimated from recorded swimming behaviours was 37% lower in the fast-growing population and 22%–29% lower in the fast-growing population based on published relationships between activity costs and axial white muscle glycolytic enzyme capacities. Consumption rates were actually 32% lower in the fast-growing population, implying that lower activity costs more than compensated for lower food intake. The agreement among the three independent measures of activity costs strongly support the idea that activity costs, rather than food intake, are a major determinant of growth differences in these two wild fish populations.