Perception of consultants, feedlot owners, and packers regarding the optimal economic slaughter endpoint in feedlots: a national survey in Brazil (Part I)

Author:

de Andrade Thiago Sérgio1,Albertini Tiago Zanett2,Barioni Luís Gustavo3,de Medeiros Sérgio Raposo4,Millen Danilo Domingues5,dos Santos Antônio Carlos Ramos1,Goulart Rodrigo Silva6,Lanna Dante Pazzanese Duarte1

Affiliation:

1. Departament of Animal Science, University of São Paulo (ESALQ/USP), Piracicaba, São Paulo 13418-900, Brazil.

2. @Tech — Innovation Technologies for Agriculture, Piracicaba, São Paulo 13418-900, Brazil.

3. Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Campinas, São Paulo 13083-886, Brazil.

4. Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil.

5. College of Technology and Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Dracena, São Paulo 17900-00, Brazil.

6. Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo (FZEA/USP), Pirassununga, São Paulo 13635-900, Brazil.

Abstract

Little information exists regarding the optimal economic slaughter endpoint (OSE) for feedlot-finished cattle in Brazil. This study investigated the perceptions of Brazilian feeders regarding the optimal time for slaughter. A total of 52 interviews were conducted involving nutritionist-consultants (n = 23), feedlot owners (n = 21), and packer-owned feedlots (n = 8). The results showed that 65% of the interviewees used weight and fat cover, both estimated visually, to determine the moment for slaughter. Identifying the ideal time for slaughter was considered a challenge for respondents, and 85% of them recognized that their current slaughter endpoint identification method needed improvements. Regarding decision support systems, 58% of respondents reported they would purchase a computer program to help identify OSE, and 73% would be interested in incorporating a prototype of such a system into their feedlots. Carcass dressing (38%) and price (25%) were the main factors driving the feeder’s choice of meatpacker, followed by carcass premiums (10%). Meat quality was found to be an irrelevant criterion for Brazilian meatpackers in awarding both premiums (5%) and deductions (3%). Slaughter endpoint is determined subjectively by the Brazilian feeders, based on a visual evaluation of both weight and fatness.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology,Food Animals

Reference37 articles.

1. A bioeconomic model for comparing beef cattle genotypes at their optimal economic slaughter end point

2. An economic comparison of beef cattle genotypes for feedlot traits at their optimal slaughter end point

3. ANUALPEC. 2018. Anuário da pecuária Brasileira. Instituto FNP e Agra FNP Pesquisas Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil.

4. Astruc, T., 2014. Conective tissue: structure, function and influence on meat quality. Vol. 1. Pages 324 in M. Dikeman and C. Devine, eds. Encyclopedia of meat sciences. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

5. BCNRM. 2016. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Nutrient requirements of beef cattle, 8th ed. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3