Potential Strategies to Improve the Quality of the Framework of Programmatic Assessment in Medical Education: Raising the Bar

Author:

Shrivastava Saurabh RamBihariLal1,Hidayah Rachmadya Nur2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community Medicine, Datta Meghe Medical College, Off-Campus Centre of Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wanadongri, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

2. Department of Medical Education and Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Jalan Farmako, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

Assessment in medical education has a special role as it ascertains the acquisition of desired knowledge, skills, and learning outcomes expected from a medical graduate who will be a part of the health-care team. Programmatic assessment has gained wide attention, as it maximizes assessment for learning and also aids in the development of a strong assessment system, which enables teachers to take a data-driven decision about each student during the high-stakes assessment. In the case of programmatic assessment, the quality of the assessment is judged with the help of elements such as coherence, continuous, comprehensive, feasibility, purpose-driven, acceptability, and transparency. In conclusion, programmatic assessment has been linked with multiple benefits for the student, the teachers, and the administrators. However, to optimize the process of attainment of learning outcomes, it is the need of the hour that educators should take specific measures to augment the quality of all the elements of the assessment framework in programmatic assessment.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference13 articles.

1. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose;van der Vleuten;Med Teach,2012

2. What programmatic assessment in medical education can learn from healthcare;Schuwirth;Perspect Med Educ,2017

3. 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment;Norcini;Med Teach,2018

4. Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning;Schuwirth;Med Teach,2011

5. Construct validity and predictive utility of internal assessment in undergraduate medical education;Badyal;Natl Med J India,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3