Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements

Published:1996-05 Issue:5 Volume:131 Page:961-965
ISSN:0002-8703
Container-title:American Heart Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:American Heart Journal

Author:

Strickberger S.Adam,Daoud Emile,Goyal Rajiva,Chan Kwok K.,Bogun Frank,Castellani Mark,Harvey Mark,Horwood Laura E.,Niebauer Mark,Man K.Ching,Morady Fred

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference24 articles.

1. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location;Saksena;Circulation,1993

2. A simplified, single-lead unipolar transvenous cardioversion-defibrillation system;Bardy;Circulation,1993

3. Implantation by electrophysiologists of 100 consecutive cardioverter defibrillators with non-thoracotomy lead systems;Strickberger;Circulation,1994

4. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode;Bardy;Circulation,1994

5. Effect of shock polarity on ventricular defibrillation threshold using a transvenous lead system;Strickberger;J Am Coll Cardiol,1994

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Saga of Defibrillation Testing: When Less Is More;Current Cardiology Reports;2018-05-05

2. Biphasic versus monophasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2016-02-10

3. Achieving low defibrillation thresholds at implant: pharmacological influences, RV coil polarity and position, SVC coil usage and positioning, pulse width settings, and the azygous vein;Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology;2010-06-30

4. Optimizing defibrillation waveforms for ICDs;Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology;2007-06-01

5. Present Understanding of Shock Polarity for Internal Defibrillation: The Obvious and Non-Obvious Clinical Implications;Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology;2006-08