Attitudes of mental health professionals and lay-people towards involuntary admission and treatment in England and Germany—a questionnaire analysis

Author:

Lepping Peter,Steinert Tilman,Gebhardt Ralf-Peter,Röttgers Hanns Rüdiger

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo identify attitudes about involuntary admission and treatment in mental health professionals and lay-people and to compare results between England and Germany.MethodThree scenarios of potentially detainable patients were presented to identify attitudes. A questionnaire asked about attitudes towards involuntary admission as well as treatment. A questionnaire analysis was then performed.ResultsThere were similar attitudes towards involuntary admission and treatment between lay-people and mental health professionals with the exception of professionals not actively involved in the detention process. The different legal frameworks between Germany and England did not influence attitudes much. Support for involuntary admission and treatment broadly increased with age.ConclusionsPsychiatrists and other mental health workers are in tune with society with regards to attitudes towards involuntary admission. People involved with mentally ill patients but not in the detention process have negative attitudes towards involuntary admission.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference9 articles.

1. Perceived Coercion in Mental Hospital Admission

2. Retrospective study of 2200 involuntary psychiatric admissions and readmissions.;Sanguineti;Am J Psychiatry,1996

3. [2] Der Spiegel. Magazine 2001;13/26.03:54–7.

4. Zwangsunterbringung und -behandlung psy-chisch Kranker in Großbritannien und Deutschland (Involuntary admission and treatment of the mentally ill in Great Britain and Germany).;Röttgers;Psychiat Prax,1999

5. Ethische Konflikte bei der Zwangsbehandlung schizophrener Patienten Entscheidungsverhalten und Einflussfaktoren an drei prototypischen Fallbeispielen

Cited by 58 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3