Perceptions and Attitudes of Mental Health Professionals toward the Mental Health Care Law in Saudi Arabia

Author:

Almadani Ahmad H.123ORCID,Altheyab Eylaf S.2ORCID,Alkheraiji Meshal A.2ORCID,Alfraiji Abdulaziz F.2ORCID,Albrekkan Fatimah123ORCID,Alkhamis AlRabab S.4ORCID,AlBuqami Fay H.5ORCID,Aljaffer Mohammed A.123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

2. Department of Psychiatry, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia

3. SABIC Psychological Health Research and Applications Chair (SPHRAC), Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia

4. Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia

5. College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

The Saudi Mental Health Care Law (SMHL) was established in 2014; however, no prior study has evaluated mental health professionals’ perceptions or attitudes toward it. This cross-sectional study examines these aspects and their associated factors among psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, and psychiatric nurses in Saudi Arabia (SA). The data were collected from 432 participants using an online electronic survey consisting of four sections, including the Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale (MHLAS). Psychiatrists comprised most participants (46.06%), followed by psychologists (36.34%). Most participants were 40 years of age or younger (83.10%). Of the 432 participants, 226 (52.31%) were females. Overall, 28.70% were unaware of the existence of the SMHL. A total of 172 (66.67%) out of 258 participants agreed that the legislation operates well in ensuring treatment for persons who require involuntary admission. There was a statistically significant association between specialty and opinions of treatment efficacy and care benefits of the SMHL (p = 0.031 and p < 0.001, respectively). Official implementation of SMHL in participants’ facilities resulted in high MHLAS scores (p = 0.007). Reading or attending lectures and workshops related to the SMHL resulted in high MHLAS scores (p = 0.044 and p = 0.021, respectively). Negative opinions and uncertainty regarding the effect of SMHL on confidentiality were associated with low total MHLAS scores (p < 0.001). This study highlights the need to increase awareness of the SMHL among Saudi Arabian healthcare workers.

Funder

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference30 articles.

1. Ethics and medical practice: Why psychiatry is unique;Sidhu;Indian J. Psychiatry,2016

2. The law and psychiatry;Simon;Focus,2003

3. Mental health legislation;Funk;East. Mediterr. Health J.,2015

4. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the right to be free from nonconsensual psychiatric interventions;Minkowitz;Syracuse J. Int’l L. Com.,2007

5. Wilson, K. (2021). Mental Health Law: Abolish or Reform?, Oxford University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3