Abstract
Preserving cultural heritage is an important task for society, especially considering historical experiences of losses that affect cultural values. The study is relevant considering the threat to cultural heritage because of many negative impacts caused by the war in Ukraine. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate and analyse the effectiveness of European institutions and legal mechanisms aimed at preserving cultural heritage in the light of historical experiences of losses, including identifying the main problems faced by Ukrainian institutions and legal systems in preserving cultural property after tragic events. The study is based on such methods as analysis, synthesis, and comparison, chosen to identify the most effective institutional practices and legal solutions. The study found that European countries have made considerable progress in preserving cultural heritage after historical losses. It was determined that institutional mechanisms, such as specialised bodies, foundations, and agencies, play a key role in the coordination and implementation of measures. Legal instruments, such as cultural heritage legislation and international treaties, provide a legal framework for the preservation of property. The findings of this study demonstrated that many countries pay special attention to public involvement in heritage preservation. Furthermore, the study helped to analyse the correlation between access to heritage sites and their protection, and to identify this as one of the main challenges of modern time. Another issue highlighted in this study was insufficient funding, which limits the possibilities of restoring and preserving cultural heritage. The results obtained make a significant contribution to the understanding of effective approaches to the preservation of cultural heritage in the context of historical losses. The paper reveals the prospects of implementing the successful experience of European countries in the national practices of Ukraine in terms of the impact of the challenges of preserving cultural property
Publisher
Scientific Journals Publishing House
Reference33 articles.
1. [1] Alhadad, E.F., & Meparishvili, T. (2019). Cultural heritage tourism as an innovative catalyst of local development: Strategies and actions. International Journal of Heritage and Museum Studies, 1(1), 107-115.
2. [2] Bosher, L., Kim, D., Okubo, T., Chmutina, K., & Jigyasu, R. (2020). Dealing with multiple hazards and threats on cultural heritage sites: An assessment of 80 case studies. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 29(1), 109-128. doi: 10.1108/DPM-08-2018-0245.
3. [3] Convention for the Protection of the architectural heritage of Europe (ETS No. 121). (1985). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=121.
4. [4] Convention on the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage. (1972). Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/.
5. [5] Daga, E., et al. (2022). Integrating citizen experiences in cultural heritage archives: Requirements, state of the art, and challenges ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH), 15(1), article number 11. doi: 10.1145/3477599.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献