STUDENTS' REFLECTIONS ON THEIR SCIENTIST- OR ENGINEER-LIKE PRACTICES IN STEM PROJECT-BASED LEARNING
-
Published:2024-02-28
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:119-130
-
ISSN:2538-7138
-
Container-title:Journal of Baltic Science Education
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JBSE
Author:
Luo Tian1ORCID, Zhao Jiayue1ORCID, So Winnie Wing Mui2ORCID, Zhan Wencong3
Affiliation:
1. Capital Normal University, P.R. China 2. The Education University of Hong Kong, P. R. China 3. Beijing Zhaodengyu School, P.R. China
Abstract
Students build up their STEM career interest based on their experiences. However, it remains unclear how students reflect on their STEM experiences in light of their understanding of STEM careers. This study aimed to explore how students relate their practices in STEM project-based learning (PBL) with their perceptions of scientists’ and engineers’ work. A randomly selected sample of students (n =142) participating in a STEM event participated in structured interviews regarding the resemblance between their months-long STEM PBL and scientists’ and engineers’ work. The data were coded using content analysis mostly by adopting a bottom-up approach followed by statistical analysis. Results showed that the majority of students claimed that their group had done things like scientists, while only about half of the students acknowledged doing things like engineers. The number and aspects of the students’ mentioned practices were generally limited, with engineer-like practices more divergent and reflecting their stereotype of engineers working as manual laborers. The results also suggest that students tend to neglect the minds-on but hands-off scientist- or engineer-like practices such as raising a question/problem. The findings address the research gap regarding how students reflect on their STEM PBL experiences in light of career development.
Keywords: project-based learning, STEM education, STEM practices, structured interviews
Publisher
Scientia Socialis Ltd
Reference63 articles.
1. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: Primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(1), 171-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.748676 2. Archer, L., Dewitt, J., & Dillon, J. (2014). 'It didn't really change my opinion': exploring what works, what doesn't and why in a school science, technology, engineering and mathematics careers intervention. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(1), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.865601 3. Banchefsky, S., Westfall, J., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2016). But you don’t look like a scientist!: Women scientists with feminine appearance are deemed less likely to be scientists. Sex Roles, 75, 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0586-1 4. Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning. Book Excerpt. George Lucas Educational Foundation. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21465 5. Bhakti, Y. B., Astuti, I. A. D., Okyranida, I. Y., Asih, D. A. S., Marhento, G., Leonard, L., & Yusro, A. C. (2020, February). Integrated STEM project-based learning implementation to improve student science process skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1464, No. 1, p. 012016). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1464/1/012016
|
|