Affiliation:
1. Large Animal Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Brasilia (UnB) Granja do Torto
Abstract
Abstract
Background: To report the feasibility of pre-scrotal castration technique in boars and document the great post-surgical evolution, thirty clinically healthy and sexually intact boars were used in a short case series.
Results: No wound exsudate or infection was recorded. Mild scrotal edema was reported in 12 (40%) boars, that resolved within 3 days after stall confinement finished. On the long-term follow-up (4-12 months’ post-surgery), all owners stated to be satisfied with the procedure, with minor post-surgical aftercare required.
Conclusion: Castration of boars using the pre-scrotal approach is a simple and safe procedure, reducing postoperative complications, and, thereby, providing better welfare, making the postoperative management of the boars, easier for handlers or owners.
Methods: Thirty boars were considered fit for pre-scrotal castration technique if the testis and scrotum were macroscopically normal and no perceptible adherences within the scrotum noticed. Dissociative anesthesia protocol and local anesthesia by intratesticular and pre-scrotal infiltrative lidocaine injection was performed. An 8-10 cm skin incision was made cranially to the hemiscrotum, and subcutaneous tissue was bluntly dissected reaching the tunica dartos, fascia, and vaginal tunica. A transfixion ligature was placed on the fibrous-muscle portion of the spermatic cord. Mesorchium was bluntly dissected to separate the spermatic cord from the surrounding fascia, and a double transfixation ligature was placed around the spermatic cord, that was sharply transected. The procedure was repeated on the contralateral testis using the same skin incision.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference17 articles.
1. 1. Squires EJ, Bone C, Cameron J. Pork production with entire males: directions for control of boar taint. Animals. 2020; 10:1–22. doi:10.3390/ani10091665.
2. 2. Zamaratskaia G, Squires EJ. Biochemical, nutritional and genetic effects on boar taint in entire male pigs. Animals. 2009;3(11):1508–1521. doi:10.1017/S1751731108003674.
3. 3. D’allaire S, Leman AD. Boar culling patterns in swine breeding herds in Minnesota. Can Vet J. 1990; 31:581–583. < https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1480838/pdf/canvetj00081-0047.pdf>
4. 4. Knecth D, Jankowska-Mąkosa A, Duziński K. Analysis of the lifetime and culling reasons for Al boars. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017; 8(49):1–9. doi:10.1186/s40104-017-0179-z
5. 5. Bañón S, Andreu C, Laencina J, Garrido MD. Fresh and eating pork from entire and castrate heavy males. Food Qual Prefer. 2004; 3:293–300. doi:10.1016/S0950-3292(03)00069-7
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献