Road Safety Differences between Priority-Controlled Intersections and Right-Hand Priority Intersections

Author:

De Ceunynck Tim1,Polders Evelien1,Daniels Stijn1,Hermans Elke1,Brijs Tom1,Wets Geert1

Affiliation:

1. Transportation Research Institute, Hasselt University, Wetenschapspark 5/6, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.

Abstract

This study analyzes interactions between two vehicles at right-hand priority intersections and priority-controlled intersections and will help to gain a better insight into safety differences between both types of intersections. Data about yielding, looking behavior, drivers’ age and gender, approaching behavior, type of maneuver, order of arrival, and communication between road users are collected by on-site observations. Logistic regression models are built to identify variables that affect the probability that a violation against the priority rules will occur and the probability that a driver will look to the side when entering the intersection. The number of right-of-way violations is significantly higher at the observed right-hand priority intersection (27% of all interactions) than at the priority-controlled intersection (8%). Furthermore, at the right-hand priority intersection, the behavior of drivers on the lower-volume road is more cautious than the behavior of drivers on the higher-volume road, and violations are more likely when the driver from the lower-volume road has priority. This situation indicates that the higher-volume road is considered as an implicit main road. At both intersection types, there is a higher probability of a right-of-way violation when the no-priority vehicle arrives first: this condition indicates that yielding is partly a matter of first come, first served. For both intersections, the way a driver approaches the intersection (i.e., stopping, decelerating, or holding the same speed) is highly relevant for the occurrence of a right-of-way violation and the probability that the driver will look to the sides on his or her approach to the intersection.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Safe Efficient Policy Optimization Algorithm for Unsignalized Intersection Navigation;IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica;2024-09

2. Comparison of E-Scooter and Bike Users’ Behavior in Mixed Traffic;Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board;2024-07-30

3. Effects of Traffic Control Device and Hazard Location on Fixations During Intersection Navigation: A Simulator Study;SAE Technical Paper Series;2024-04-09

4. Comparing implicit communication via longitudinal driving dynamics: A cross-cultural study in Germany and the UK;Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour;2024-04

5. Index of braking behaviour in two dimensions within risk perception;Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour;2024-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3