Effects of Traffic Control Device and Hazard Location on Fixations During Intersection Navigation: A Simulator Study

Author:

Caren Brooklin1,Ziraldo Erika1,Oliver Michele1

Affiliation:

1. University of Guelph

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Collisions resulting in injuries or fatalities occur more frequently at intersections. This is partly because safe navigation of intersections requires drivers to accurately observe and respond to other road users with conflicting paths. Previous studies have raised questions about how traffic control devices and the positioning of other road users might affect drivers' visual search strategies when navigating intersections.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">To address these questions, four left-turn-across-path (LTAP) scenarios were created by combining two types of traffic control devices (stop signs and traffic lights) with two hazard starting locations (central and peripheral). Seventy-four licensed drivers responded to all scenarios in a counterbalanced order using a full vehicle driving simulator. Eye-tracking glasses were used to monitor eye movements, both before and after hazard onset.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The results revealed that drivers at the signalized intersections took longer to fixate the LTAP hazard before onset, spent less time fixated on the hazard, and made fewer visits to the hazard compared to drivers at the unsignalized, stop-sign controlled intersections. There were no significant main effects of hazard location on the eye tracking measures, however, there was an interaction between the traffic control device and the hazard location on total fixation duration. Participants fixated the signal-controlled hazards longer in the central location but fixated the stop-sign controlled hazards longer in the peripheral location.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Despite the inherent risks of intersecting traffic, results indicate the drivers at signalized intersections rely heavily on the traffic control device to prevent collisions. Given the high speed and traffic volume at signalized intersections, these results can be used to justify the implementation of measures such as protected left turn signals and other infrastructure changes aimed at reducing the frequency and severity of LTAP collisions.</div></div>

Publisher

SAE International

Reference36 articles.

1. Lemonnier , S. , Désiré , L. , Brémond , R. , and Baccino , T. Drivers’ Visual Attention: A Field Study at Intersections Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 69 2020 206 221 10.1016/j.trf.2020.01.012

2. Canada , T. and Collision , N. Database 2022

3. Richards , D.C. Relationship between Speed and Risk of Fatal Injury: Pedestrians and Car Occupants London 2010 19 22

4. Transportation Research Board Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Volume 5: A Guide for Addressing Unsignalized Intersection Collisions 0309087600 2003

5. Caren , B. , Ziraldo , E. , and Oliver , M. Comparing Visual Fixations between Initially Stopped and In-motion Turn Across Path Hazards SAE Technical Paper 2023-01-0837 2023 https://doi.org/10.4271/2023-01-0837

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3