Affiliation:
1. GALATASARAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HUKUK FAKÜLTESİ, ÖZEL HUKUK BÖLÜMÜ, MİLLETLERARASI ÖZEL HUKUK ANABİLİM DALI
Abstract
The principle of pacta sunt servanda, according to which every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed in good faith aims at maintaining stability in international legal order. However, in cases where important change of circumstances occurs with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, the balance between the parties may be disturbed and the aim and the purpose of the treaty may become meaningless. Therefore, if the principle of pacta sunt servanda is interpreted as containing no exception, States would be reluctant to establish contractual relationships that could not be terminated even in very different conditions and circumstances. This would certainly cause instability in international relations.
International law aims at establishing the balance between stability and change by the principle traditionally referred to as rebus sic stantibus which is based on the idea that treaties cannot be considered as being independent from the conditions that paved the way for their conclusion. According to this principle, in some cases where a fundamental change of circumstances which has occurred with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, and which was not foreseen by the parties, these latter may terminate the treaty or withdraw from it.
Although being a settled principle of positive international law, the meaning of rebus sic stantibus generates intensive debate among States and national and international judicial instances. Article 62 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the international jurisprudence interpret the principle objectively in light of the “shared expectations” of the parties to international treaties. Whereas States seem to invoke the principle based on their subjective “vital interests”. This article discusses how the principle needs to be interpreted to achieve its aim without being discretionary used by States.
Reference49 articles.
1. Akkaya D, Uluslararası Andlaşmalarda Şartların Esaslı Değişimi: Rebus Sic Stantibus İlkesi (Seçkin 2021).
2. Ayhan H, Uluslararası Antlaşmalar Hukukunda Şartların Esaslı Değişikliği İlkesi. Rebus Sic Stantibus İlkesi (Adalet 2018).
3. Brierly JL, ‘Some Considerations on the Obsolescence of Treaties’ (1925) 11 Transactions of the Grotius Society 11-20.
4. Brierly JL, The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace (Clarendon Press 1963).
5. Briggs HW, ‘Unilateral Denunciation of Treaties: The Vienna Convention and the International Court of Justice’ (1974) 68(1) American Journal of International Law 51-68.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献