Author:
McCall Cassandra,Edwards Cherie
Reference82 articles.
1. Anthony, L. J., Palius, M. F., Maher, C. A., & Moghe, P. V. (2007). Using discourse analysis to study a cross-disciplinary learning community: Insights from an IGERT training program. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(2), 141-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00924.x
2. Baker, C., Wuest, J., & Stern, P. N. (1992). Method slurring: The grounded theory/phenomenology example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(11), 1355-1360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01859.x
3. Baker, S., Tancred, P., & Whitesides, S. (2002). Gender and graduate school: Engineering students confront life after the B. Eng. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1), 41-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00671.x
4. Beddoes, K., Schimpf, C. M., & Pawley, A. L. (2014, June 15-18). New metaphors for new understandings: Ontological questions about developing grounded theories in engineering education [Paper presentation]. 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22867
5. Bello, A. U. (2015). Using the Classical Grounded Theory rather than the Strauss and Corbin approach in accounting and management Research. In V. Cassar (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies (pp. 41-47). Academic Conferences and Publishing International, Ltd. http://library.palcomtech.com/pdf/5421.pdf
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献