Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance
Author:
Bullock James M. R.1, Federle Walter1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
Abstract
SUMMARYMany beetles employ arrays of adhesive setae to control attachment during locomotion. Here we investigate whether and how variation in seta structure,both between sexes and between tarsal pads on the same leg, determines the mechanical properties and adhesive performance of fibrillar arrays. We vertically compressed individual adhesive pads to determine their effective elastic modulus. Distal adhesive arrays were significantly softer than middle and proximal ones. Variation in stiffness was mainly due to different seta diameters, but calculated elastic moduli of seta cuticle were relatively constant at 5–16 GPa. Consistent with their greater compliance, distal pads generated higher adhesion and friction on rough substrates. However, the greater stiffness of proximal pads conveys a superior ability to push. Proximal pads of males were less direction dependent than distal pads and generated larger pushing forces in the distal and lateral directions. In females, proximal pads also produced higher friction forces than distal pads,but only in the lateral direction. Video recordings of vertically climbing beetles confirmed that each pad was used differently. When legs above the body centre of gravity were pulling, beetles mainly engaged the distal pads,whereas legs below the centre of gravity mainly pushed with the proximal pads. Attachment performance was additionally compared between sexes on different substrates. Our findings demonstrate the presence of sex-specific specialisations of the fibrillar system as well as a division of labour between different adhesive pads on the same tarsus.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference52 articles.
1. Arzt, E., Gorb, S. and Spolenak, R. (2003). From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA100,10603-10606. 2. Autumn, K. and Hansen, W. (2006). Ultrahydrophobicity indicates a non-adhesive default state in gecko setae. J. Comp. Physiol. A192,1205-1212. 3. Autumn, K., Liang, Y. A., Hsieh, S. T., Zesch, W., Chan, W. P.,Kenny, T. W., Fearing, R. and Full, R. J. (2000). Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature405,681-685. 4. Autumn, K., Dittmore, A., Santos, D., Spenko, M. and Cutkosky,M. (2006a). Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment. J. Exp. Biol.209,3569-3579. 5. Autumn, K., Hsieh, S. T., Dudek, D. M., Chen, J., Chitaphan, C. and Full, R. J. (2006b). Dynamics of geckos running vertically. J. Exp. Biol.209,260-272.
Cited by
91 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|