Affiliation:
1. University of Calgary, Canada
Abstract
This chapter explores the limits of simulations for university-level historical education. The authors develop an alternative gamic mode more fit for purpose by focusing on epistemology and procedural rhetoric. This chapter will start by examining how history functions as a form of disciplinary knowledge and how this disciplinary way of knowing things is taught at the post-secondary level. The manner in which history is taught will be contrasted with its evaluation in order to better define what students are actually expected to learn. The simulation will be then examined in the light of learning goals and evaluation. This will demonstrate that simulations are in fact a poor fit for most post-secondary history courses. The more appropriate and effective choice is to construct the past via procedural rhetoric, using games that mirror the structure of the historical argument.
Reference52 articles.
1. American Historical Association. (n.d.). Statement of Excellence in Classroom Teaching of History. Retrieved May 26, 2010 from http://www.historians.org/teaching/policy/ExcellentTeaching.htm
2. Knowledge practices: ‘doing the subject’ in undergraduate courses
3. “Half-reliable”: A qualitative analysis of epistemic thinking in and about a digital game
4. Developmental Gains of a History Major: A Case for Building a Theory of Disciplinary Writing Expertise.;A.Beaufort;Research in the Teaching of English,2004
5. Serious games...and less!
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献