Abstract
Digital child and youth research is often conducted in schools involving minors. Corresponding research designs raise two related sets of problems: Ethical issues with regard to working with vulnerable groups like children and adolescents and access to these groups. The latter pertains to the concept of gatekeeping which is an ethical issue in and of itself if certain groups or areas of research are systematically excluded from empirical research and, consequently, from the resulting benefits. Thus, our study examines how perceived ethical challenges influence gatekeepers’ decisions to grant or deny access to investigate a potentially problematic topic: pupils’ group communication. We addressed this research question empirically via semi-structured in-depth interviews with eight educational gatekeepers in Germany inquiring their attitudes on research in schools in general and on the specific topic of pupils’ group communication via instant messaging as an exemplar of digital child and youth research. Approaching the question from two perspectives (procedural ethics and ethics in practice), we identified hierarchical power structures within multiple levels of gatekeeping and revealed rationales to deny access based on ethical considerations with regard to the given scenario of pupils’ group communication.
Reference39 articles.
1. Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
2. Attwell, G. (2007). Personal learning environments-the future of eLearning. Elearning Papers, 2(1), 1–8.
3. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
4. Bork-Hüffer, T., Mahlknecht, B., & Kaufmann, K. (2020). (Cyber)bullying in schools—When bullying stretches across cON/FFlating spaces. Children’s Geographies, 19(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2020.1784850
5. boyd, d., & Marwick, A. E. (2011). Social privacy in networked publics: Teens’ attitudes, practices, and strategies (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1925128). SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1925128
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献