Communication of information in the digital age among social sciences students

Author:

Pinto Maria,Fernandez-Pascual Rosaura,Sales Dora

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the informational behavior of a group of future professionals in the field of social sciences (SS), in terms of their competence in the communication–dissemination of information. Design/methodology/approach The IL-HUMASS, EVALCI/KN and EVALCI/SK tests regarding the affective (attitudes, motivations) and cognitive (knowledge, skills) dimensions are distributed to a stratified sample of five universities and eight degree courses in Spain. Infographics and non-parametric methods allow to compare the disciplinary profiles with regard to gender, academic course and academic degrees. An Information Literacy Communication synthetic indicator based on structural equation modeling includes the subjective and effective dimensions to measure the holistic learning outcomes in communication–dissemination of information. Findings Significant differences regarding the informational behavior of future professionals in SS are discovered. The synthetic indicator allows academic degrees to be ranked in order to identify those in need of initiatives aimed at improving communication–dissemination competence. Practical implications Findings must be taken into account to design effective learning programs. This methodological approach can be expanded to scientific and academic environments. Originality/value The paper puts forward the first evidence-based study on communication–dissemination competence among future SS professionals, as no similar research has been found in the scientific literature. It is also the first time that the definition of a predictive performance indicator, based on a powerful statistical methodology, has been proposed.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference49 articles.

1. ACRL (2013), “Intersections of creating strategic collaborations for a changing academic environment scholarly communication and information literacy”, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/Intersections.pdf (accessed November 18, 2017).

2. ACRL Board (2016), “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education”, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (accessed November 20, 2017).

3. The what and who of information literacy and critical thinking in higher education;Portal: Libraries and the Academy,2007

4. The technological capabilities of nations: the state of the art of synthetic indicators;Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2009

5. Exploring the connections between information literacy and writing for international students;Journal of Information Literacy,2008

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3