Abstract
PurposeThis research work had been a double objective, to help the students achieve the learning outcomes, scientific skills and on the other hand, to develop specific scientific sub-competences, all of these related not only with the conceptual knowledge but also with the knowledge of procedurals and epistemology.Design/methodology/approachA didactic sequence has been designed and applied with students of the University Catholique of Louvain (Belgium) in collaboration with teachers from the University of Zaragoza (also researchers in the knowledge areas of Electronics, Applied Physics and the Didactics of Experimental Sciences). Several methodologies were applied thorough the teaching-learning sequence as the flipped classroom is. A varied sample of assessment instruments was used.FindingsThe results suggest this sequence produces a more significant learning than a more conventional teaching, however there is no increase in the number of students who passed. The students explaining phenomena scientifically, evaluating and designing experiments and making researchable questions and interpreting data and scientific evidence, which are a consequence of the development of scientific knowledge (content, procedural and epistemic). In addition, the students kept motivated by this methodological change and maintained the perception of having achieved the expected learning according to the objectives of the course.Originality/valueUntil a few years ago, research in the didactics of experimental sciences, and the application in the classroom of the results obtained, was limited to education in non-university stages. The opportunity of this work is to expand knowledge in relation to the application of didactic strategies in physics education at a higher level.
Reference43 articles.
1. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research;Higher Education Research and Development,2015
2. Learning of the theory of electromagnetic induction in university courses of general physics. A teaching by guided problem solving;Enseñanza de las Ciencias,2016
3. Artigue, M. (2015), “Perspectives on design research: the case of didactical engineering”, in Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Knipping, C. and Presmeg, N. (Éds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education : Examples of Methodology and Methods, pp. 467-496. Springer Netherlands.
4. Barquero, B. and Bosch, M. (2015), “Didactic engineering as a research methodology : from fundamental situations to study and research paths”, in Watson, A. and Ohtani, M. (Éds.), Task Design in Mathematics Education : an ICMI Study, Vol. 22, pp. 249-272, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-09629-2_8, Springer International Publishing.