Author:
Schneider Kenneth C.,Rodgers William C.,Bristow Dennis N.
Abstract
The literature provides substantial evidence of gender differences in the level of assertive and/or competitive traits an individual is likely to exhibit. Further, it has been established that those individual differences are related to certain exchange strategies employed by each gender. The primary research objectives in this study were, first, to develop a reliable pencil‐and‐paper scale assessing consumers’ propensity to employ bargaining tactics in marketing exchange situations; and second, to investigate gender differences in consumers’ bargaining propensity. The results of the study showed that the first research objective was successfully achieved in the form of the Bargaining Propensity Scale, and that statistically significant gender differences in bargaining propensity scores did occur. Managerial implications and avenues for future research are discussed.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing
Reference17 articles.
1. Andelin, H.B. (1980), Fascinating Womanhood, Bantam, New York, NY, pp. 241‐4.
2. Bem, S.L. (1974), “The measurement of psychological androgyny”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 42 No.2, pp. 155‐62.
3. Block, J.H. (1973), “Conceptions of sex role: some cross‐cultural and longitudinal perspectives”, American Psychologist, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 512‐26.
4. Bradsher, K. (1996), “Sticker shock: car buyers miss haggling ritual’’, The New York Times, June 13, 145, pp. C1, D1.
5. Churchill, G.A. Jr (1979), “A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, February, pp. 64‐73.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献