Author:
Spasojevic Brkic Vesna,Tomic Branislav
Abstract
Purpose
– Lean management and Six Sigma concepts are derived from two different points of view, but it is evident that the role of employees is crucial in both concepts. The purpose of this paper is to survey which employees’ behaviour dimensions can lead organization to better concepts integration and how Lean Six Sigma activity contributes to employees’ performance.
Design/methodology/approach
– Research methodology is designed to empirically check, on large sample of companies in multinational company supply chain, if employees’ factors are both predictor and response variables of Lean Six Sigma concept. To check stated hypothesis factor, reliability and multiple regression analysis are used.
Findings
– The first finding of this study is that reward system and training are significant predictors of Lean Six Sigma activities. The second part of findings shows that Lean Six Sigma dimensions, such as Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control/Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, and Validate, 5S and Kanban positively influences employees’ performance, described by employee satisfaction, absenteeism, salaries and benefits, employees’ commitment and employee turnover rate.
Research limitations/implications
– Poka-Yoke application is not found as a significant predictor of employees’ performance. Accordingly, to explore that interesting finding, possible future research topic is more detailed analysis of Poka-Yoke application in similar supply chains. A longitudinal analysis using structural equation is possible direction of future work, too.
Practical implications
– This survey answers the need for Lean and Six Sigma unified methodology achievement in soft factors area and gives applicable results for companies in supply chain that produces low-volume, high-complexity products.
Originality/value
– Original and valuable conclusion is that employees’ factors are both predictor and response variables of Lean Six Sigma concept application.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference35 articles.
1. Achanga, P.
,
Shehab, E.
,
Roy, R.
and
Nelder, G.
(2005), “Lean manufacturing to improve cost-effectiveness of SMEs”, in
Ball, P.D.
,
Bititci, U.S.
and
MacBryde, J.C.
(Eds),
Seventh International Conference on Stimulating Manufacturing Excellence in Small and Medium Enterprises
, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, pp. 263-268.
2. Antony, J.
(2004), “Some pros and cons of Six Sigma: an academic perspective”,
The TQM Magazine
, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 303-306.
3. Antony, J.
(2011), “Six Sigma vs Lean: some perspectives from leading academics and practitioners”,
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 185-190.
4. Arnheiter, E.D.
and
Maleyeff, J.
(2005), “The integration of lean management and Six Sigma”,
The TQM Magazine
, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 5-18.
5. Bendell, T.
(2006), “A review and comparison of Six Sigma and the Lean organizations”,
The TQM magazine
, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 255-262.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献