The integration of lean management and Six Sigma

Author:

Arnheiter Edward D.,Maleyeff John

Abstract

PurposeTo eliminate many misconceptions regarding Six Sigma and lean management by describing each system and the key concepts and techniques that underlie their implementation. This discussion is followed by a description of what lean organizations can gain from Six Sigma and what Six Sigma organizations can gain from lean management.Design/methodology/approachComparative study of Six Sigma and lean management using available literature, critical analysis, and knowledge and professional experience of the authors.FindingsThe joint implementation of the programs will result in a lean, Six Sigma (LSS) organization, overcoming the limitations of each program when implemented in isolation. A thorough analysis of the two programs provides some likely reasons why the programs alone may fail to achieve absolute perfection.Practical implicationsA lean, Six Sigma (LSS) organization would capitalize on the strengths of both lean management and Six Sigma. An LSS organization would include three primary tenets of lean management, and the LSS organization would include three primary tenets of Six Sigma.Originality/valueSuggestions are made regarding concepts and methods that would constitute a lean, Six Sigma organization. Figures summarize the nature of improvements that may occur in organizations that practice lean management or Six Sigma, and the corresponding improvements that an integrated program could offer.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Industrial relations,General Decision Sciences

Reference22 articles.

1. Anné, D.C. (2000), “Modern mobile laboratories”, Pollution Engineering, Vol. 32 No. 8, pp. 37‐9.

2. Burke, R.J., Davis, R.D., Kaminsky, F.C. and Roberts, A.E.P. (1995), “The effect of inspector errors on the true fraction nonconforming: an industrial experiment”, Quality Engineering, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 543‐50.

3. Devore, J.L. (2000), Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, 5th ed., Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA, pp. 119‐26.

4. Emiliani, M.L. (2001), “Redefining the focus of investment analysts”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 34‐50.

5. Emiliani, M.L. (2003), Better Thinking, Better Results, The Center for Lean Business Management, Kensington, CT.

Cited by 348 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3