Six Sigma vs Lean

Author:

Antony Jiju

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present the fundamental and critical differences between two of the most powerful methodologies in a process excellence initiative in any organisation.Design/methodology/approachThe approach taken was to collate opinions from a number of leading academics and practitioners from five different countries. It was also important to ensure that all participants have a good knowledge and expertise in the field of both Lean and Six Sigma methodologies.FindingsAlthough both methodologies are focused on process and quality improvement, Lean is formalisation and codification of experience and judgement which is not a feature of Six Sigma. Lean emphasises speed and waste, however Six Sigma emphasises variation, defects and process evaluation.Research limitations/implicationsThe viewpoints expressed in the article are those of a few academics and practitioners. It is important to capture the viewpoints of more academics and practitioners to arrive at sound and valid conclusions.Originality/valueThe paper provides an excellent resource for many researchers and for practitioners who are engaged in research and applications of the most two powerful methodologies for achieving and sustaining operational excellence. It is also critical to understand the fundamental differences between these two methodologies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference7 articles.

1. Antony, J., Escamilla, J.L. and Caine, P. (2003), “Lean Sigma”, Manufacturing Engineer, Vol. 82 No. 2, pp. 40‐3.

2. Bossert, J. et al., (2002), “Your opinion: Are Six Sigma and Lean manufacturing really different?”, ASQ Six Sigma Forum Magazine, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 38‐43.

3. Salzman, S., Rabeneck, L.T. and Rabeneck, S.K. (2002), Comprehensive Six Sigma Reference Guide, Corporate Document Services, Kansas City, MO.

4. Sharma, U. (2003), “Implementing Lean principles with the Six Sigma advantage: how a battery company realised significant improvements”, Journal of Organisational Excellence, Summer, pp. 43‐52.

5. Smith, B. (2003), “Lean and Six Sigma – a one‐two punch”, Quality Progress, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 37‐41.

Cited by 155 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The application of lean six sigma to improve mining transportation overall vehicle effectiveness (MTOVE): a case study in mining company;International Journal of Lean Six Sigma;2024-08-16

2. Evaluation of critical success factors for successful implementation of Lean Six Sigma in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in India;Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering;2024-06-27

3. Systematic literature review of lean management in local government organizations;International Journal of Lean Six Sigma;2024-06-25

4. Novel Based Design of System for the Purpose of Supply Chain with Fuzzy Logic Algorithms and its Models;2024 4th International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE);2024-05-14

5. Applications of Augmented Reality in Industrial Unit Processes;Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage;2024-03-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3