Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore the dynamics of critical thinking for informed action within the frame of six sample US states’ Kindergarten-5 social studies content standards.Design/methodology/approachThis study used quantitative content analysis. In addition to describing how the states’ standards present critical thinking for informed action, four variables were included: the enrollment weight of the states, textbook adoption status to advance standards, summative test status for social studies and grade levels.FindingsThe results indicate complex variations in context-based critical thinking levels are required by the sample states’ content standards with an extensive orientation toward superficial contextual thinking.Originality/valueThe study provides a new lens with which to make sense of students’ context-based critical thinking, as it relates to the expectations found in standards. It discusses the implications of the states’ K-5 standards on engaging students in critical thinking.
Reference65 articles.
1. Adam, M. (2020), “Most and least diverse states in America”, available at: https://wallethub.com/edu/most-least-diverse-states-in-america/38262.
2. Teaching students to be political in a nonpartisan way: reflections from action civics education across red and blue states;Peabody Journal of Education,2021
3. Evaluating online sources: helping students determine trustworthiness, readability, and usefulness;Social Studies and Young Learner,2012
4. Students' and teachers' beliefs about historical empathy in secondary history education;Theory and Research in Social Education,2020
5. Curricular messages: how state standards and children's books narrate 9/11;The Journal of Social Studies Research,2017
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献