Author:
Bamford David,Forrester Paul,Dehe Benjamin,Leese Rebecca Georgina
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the implementation of lean within two contrasting UK-based organizations; a food manufacturer and a healthcare organization. The different contexts provide insight to the strategic desire for efficiency gains and tactical issues and challenges of lean execution and implementation.
Design/methodology/approach
– The research questions developed from the review of the literature were tested using evidence from field-based, action research within a food manufacturer and a National Health Service organization. The reported contrasting case studies contribute to the longer term debate on the adoption and adaptation of lean-based “best practice” within organizations.
Findings
– There are three primary findings: first, that the adoption of lean provides a strategic benefit, as well as providing a basis for a strategy of operational change; second, that partial, as opposed to full, adoption of lean occurs due to external organizational constraints, such as demand patterns, supplier unreliability, little expertise in deploying change programmes, etc.; and third, that a company will balance the adoption of the lean ideology against the financial costs and operational risks incurred in full adoption.
Practical implications
– The conclusions drawn add substantially to the ongoing commentaries on aspects of lean, and develop interesting questions for future research regards the developed “Cycles of Lean Implementation” concept.
Originality/value
– The conclusion proposes that partial implementation of the lean philosophy does not necessarily represent a conscious organizational choice, or any lack of conviction, but is representative of external constraints on the organization. This complements previous commentaries on appropriate strategies and develops interesting questions for future research into operational efficiency.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference86 articles.
1. Alvesson, M.
and
Deetz, S.A.
(2000),
Doing Critical Management Research
, SAGE Publishing, London.
2. Arnheiter, E.D.
and
Maleyeff, J.
(2005), “The integration of Lean management and Six Sigma”,
The TQM Magazine
, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 5-18.
3. Bamford, D.
(2011), “The lean leadership paradigm”, Session at Lean Management Journal Annual Conference, Birmingham, June.
4. Bamford, D.
and
Forrester, P.
(2003), “Managing planned and emergent change within an operations management environment”,
International Journal of Operations and Production Management
, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 546-564.
5. Beard, L.
and
Butler, S.A.
(2000), “Introducing JIT manufacturing: it’s easier than you think”,
Business Horizons
, Vol. 43 No. 5, pp. 61-64.
Cited by
84 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献