Consumer views on “healthier” processed meat
Author:
Shan Liran Christine,Regan Aine,Monahan Frank J,Li Chenguang,Murrin Celine,Lalor Fiona,Wall Patrick G.,McConnon Aine
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to investigate consumer attitudes towards and interest in enriching processed meat with healthy ingredients (“functional processed meat”).
Design/methodology/approach
– Seven focus groups across age and gender were conducted. Discussions were analysed using an inductive thematic approach.
Findings
– Strategies that participants felt as important for improving the healthiness of processed meat mainly included the use of better quality meat and less salt, fat, preservatives and other additives. “Functional processed meat” was a new concept for participants. Four themes were constructed to reflect participants’ attitudes towards functional processed meat: opposing views on processed meat as a carrier of healthy ingredients; belief in the health benefits of functional processed meat; perceived value of functional processed meat for different consumer groups; and trust and perceived risk surrounding the functional food concept. A large proportion of the participants were unconvinced about the concept of functional processed meat; however many of the participants expressed an openness to purchase this food product if taste and price remained uncompromised.
Research limitations/implications
– The sample size of the current study is small. Complementary quantitative research with a more representative sample should be implemented. Adopting a quantitative approach, the findings from this study should be explored further to investigate their application in a representative sample of the population.
Originality/value
– This study represents a first exploratory investigation of consumer views on functional processed meat. It can inform further consumer and market research in relation to the development of “healthier” processed meat.
Subject
Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference59 articles.
1. Arcand, J.
,
Mendoza, J.
,
Qi, Y.
,
Henson, S.
,
Lou, W.
and
L’Abbe, M.R.
(2013), “Results of a national survey examining Canadians’ concern, actions, barriers, and support for dietary sodium reduction interventions”,
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 628-631. 2. Barnett, J.
,
McConnon, A.
,
Kennedy, J.
,
Raats, M.
,
Shepherd, R.
,
Verbeke, W.
,
Fletcher, J.
,
Kuttschreuter, M.
,
Lima, L.
,
Wills, J.
and
Wall, P.
(2011), “Development of strategies for effective communication of food risks and benefits across Europe: design and conceptual framework of the FoodRisC project”,
BMC Public Health
, Vol. 11, pp. 308-316. 3. Barrios, E.X.
and
Costell, E.
(2004), “Review: use of methods of research into consumers’ opinions and attitudes in food research”,
Food Science and Technology International
, Vol. 10 No. 6, pp. 359-371. 4. Bech-Larsen, T.
and
Grunert, K.G.
(2003), “The perceived healthiness of functional foods – a conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and American consumers’ perception of functional foods”,
Appetite
, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 9-14. 5. Bolger, Z.
,
Brunton, N.P.
,
Lyng, J.G.
and
Monahan, F.J.
(2016), “Comminuted meat products – consumption, composition and approaches to healthier”,
Food Reviews International
, available at: www.dx.doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2016.1149861 (accessed 25 May 2015).
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|