Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to identify the barriers experienced as “apprentice practitioners” transitioned from a course of project management (PM) education into a project‐centric work place, in order to improve understanding of the limitations of classroom‐based education at the level of the individual.Design/methodology/approachThe paper describes a longitudinal study over two years, during which data were collected from a series of on‐line surveys and one‐to‐one interviews with a data set that comprised 78 military students.FindingsThe research results confirmed some of the benefits associated with classroom‐based PM education (learning the language, tools & techniques) and identified key barriers to the application of learning in the workplace.Research limitations/implicationsThe study's validity, particularly in respect of generalisability, should not be overstated. Organisational maturity plays a part in shaping the approach to individual learning and these aspects were not assessed.Practical implicationsThe paper argues that a more strategic approach to PM people development is required, involving a move away from traditional classroom‐based interventions at the level of the individual to a paradigm where the same individuals are able to immerse themselves in active team‐based learning as part of their day‐job.Originality/valueThe findings of this study resonate with those of earlier work and set the PM situation into the context of other disciplines.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference58 articles.
1. Alam, M., Gale, A., Brown, M. and Kidd, C. (2008), “The development and delivery of an industry led project management development programme”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 223‐37.
2. Barron, S. (2005), Assessing Project Management Learning – How Can it Make a Difference? Excellence in Learning and Teaching for Project Management, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth.
3. Berggren, C. and Söderland, J. (2008), “Rethinking project management education: social twists and knowledge co‐production”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 286‐96.
4. Bond, P. (2009), “Communities of practice and complexity: conversation and culture”, available at: www.leader‐values.com (accessed 28 August).
5. Brannen, J. (2005), Mixed Methods Research: A Discussion Paper, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, London.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献