Abstract
Purpose
In recent years, the field of social studies education has seen renewed interest in using inquiry to teach intradisciplinary concepts and skills. However, prospective primary grade teachers may have few (if any) opportunities to observe classroom teachers modeling inquiry during field placements. Methods courses provide fitting contexts in which to introduce preservice teachers (PSTs) to inquiry as a basis for intellectually challenging, meaningful social studies instruction. The purpose of this paper is to utilize a published inquiry curriculum developed for the New York Social Studies Toolkit (NYSST) Project as a tool to explore PSTs’ thinking about teaching first grade economics.
Design/methodology/approach
This qualitative study utilized focus groups with two groups of early childhood PSTs enrolled in a social studies methods course (n=28). Secondary data sources included PSTs’ handwritten comments on hard copies of the inquiry curriculum and the researcher’s analytic memos.
Findings
In the process of critiquing curriculum during focus group interviews, PSTs concentrated on the proposed tasks, evaluated those tasks for their potential to affect children’s understanding, and suggested new activities that would promote more active student engagement. Participants recognized the significance of children’s prior knowledge and were sensitive to students’ family values, although they underestimated young children’s capacity for robust discussion and intellectually challenging content.
Originality/value
This study is unique in its use of a published NYSST Project inquiry to explore how PSTs make sense of new curriculum. Its attention to PST education for primary grades contributes to elementary social studies literature. Additionally, this study addresses a general concern in teacher education about the need for PSTs to develop skills in interpreting and adapting curriculum materials. Findings suggest that engaging PSTs in discussions about social studies curriculum can help teacher educators identify latent learning goals for their courses that may be overlooked or assumed unnecessary.
Reference56 articles.
1. Preservice elementary teachers’ economic literacy: closing gates to full implementation of the social studies curriculum;Journal of Social Studies Research,2015
2. Barton, K. and Avery, P. (2016), “Research on social studies education: Diverse students, settings, and methods”, in Gitomer, D.H. and Bell, C.A. (Eds), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 5th ed., American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, pp. 985-1038.
3. Collaborative lesson planning as professional development for beginning primary teachers;The New Educator,2014
4. Beginning primary teachers’ experiences with curriculum guides and pacing calendars for math and science instruction;Journal of Research in Childhood Education,2015
5. Is it cute or does it count? Learning to teach for meaningful social studies in elementary grades;Journal of Social Studies Research,2016
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献