Consumer preferences in food packaging: CUB models and conjoint analysis
Author:
Arboretti Rosa,Bordignon Paolo
Abstract
Purpose
– Packaging features have been shown to be of great importance for the consumer final choice of fresh products (Silayoi and Speece, 2007). Packaging is an extrinsic attribute, which consumers tend to rely on, when relevant intrinsic attributes of the product are not available. In the current literature, studies on the influences of packaging features on consumer preferences are mainly related to classical preference evaluation methods like conjoint analysis (CA). The purpose of this paper is to apply both CA and the less known combination of uniform discrete and shifted binomial distributions (CUB) models to food packaging evaluations.
Design/methodology/approach
– Starting from a real case study in this field, along with CA, the author apply CUB models (Iannario and Piccolo, 2010) as a useful tool to evaluate preferences. CUB models can grasp some psychological characteristics of consumers related to the “feeling” toward packaging attributes and related to an inherently “uncertainty” that affects the consumers’ choices. Both psychological characteristics “feeling” and “uncertainty” can be linked to relevant subject’s information. At first we detect preferred packaging attributes of fresh food by means of CA, then we apply CUB models to some relevant attributes from the CA study.
Findings
– Results show that attributes like packaging material and size/shape of packaging are the most important attributes and that biodegradable packaging, reclosable trays/bags and long “best by” date are also valuable features for consumers. The introduction of covariates showed that specific demographic characteristics are linked to both feeling and uncertainty.
Originality/value
– The “data driven” segmentation results give to the integrated approach “CUB models and Conjoint Analysis” the most important added value.
Subject
Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference29 articles.
1. Agresti, A.
(2002),
Categorical Data Analysis
, 2nd ed., John Wiley
&
Sons, New York, NY. 2. Ares, G.
,
Besio, M.
,
Gimenez, A.
and
Deliza, R.
(2010), “Relationship between involvement and functional milk desserts intention to purchase. Influence on attitude towards packaging characteristics”,
Appetite
, Vol. 55 No. 2, pp. 298-304. 3. Cicia, G.
,
Corduas, M.
,
Del Giudice, T.
and
Piccolo, D.
(2010), “Valuing consumer preferences with the CUB model: a case study of fair trade coffee”,
International Journal on Food System Dynamics
, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 82-93. 4. Connolly, A.
and
Davidson, L.
(1996), “How does design affect decisions at point of sale?”,
Journal of Brand Management
, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 100-107. 5. Corduas, M.
,
Iannario, M.
and
Piccolo, D.
(2009), “A class of statistical models for evaluating services and performances”, in
Monari, P.
,
Bini, M.
,
Piccolo, D.
and
Salmaso, L.
(Eds),
Statistical Methods for the Evaluation of Educational Services and Quality of Products
, Physica-Verlag HD, Heidelberg, pp. 99-117.
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|