Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine the costs to audit firms in terms of lost revenues of losing small clients due to auditor switching or client bankruptcy after issuing first-time going concern modified opinions.
Design/methodology/approach
– A population of small Swedish companies receiving first-time going concern modified opinions in 2009 was examined to determine the effects two years later compared with a matched sample of financially stressed companies that had not received going concern modified opinions.
Findings
– The results indicate that both auditor switching and client bankruptcy are positively related to receipt of going concern modified opinions. Furthermore, the authors find empirical evidence that auditors issuing first-time going concern modified opinions lose proportionately more fees through auditor switching and client bankruptcy than do auditors not issuing such opinions to financially stressed clients. Finally, the authors found that the going concern modified opinions issued by Big 4 firms are no more harmful to clients than are those issued by other audit firms.
Research limitations/implications
– The authors recognize a limitation of this study regarding the choice of control companies. Although the authors attempted to find similarly sized and similarly financially stressed companies from the same industries as those companies in the test group, the authors may have missed other variables relevant to auditor switching or client bankruptcy.
Practical implications
– A practical implication for the audit profession is the increased awareness of the fact that the financial dependence issues reported in this study extend to auditors with small client companies.
Originality/value
– This is the first study to examine fees lost due to auditor switching and client bankruptcy caused by going concern modified opinions in a population of small companies. It contributes to the mixed evidence presented in previous research as to the extent to which going concern modified audit opinions are self-fulfilling prophecies.
Reference72 articles.
1. Altman, E.I.
(1993), Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy: A Complete Guide to Predicting and Avoiding Distress and Profiting from Bankruptcy, Wiley, New York, NY.
2. Arnold, V.
,
Collier, P.A.
,
Leech, S.A.
and
Sutton, S.G.
(2001), “The impact of political pressure on novice decision makers: are auditors qualified to make going-concern judgements?”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 323-338.
3. Bamber, E.M.
and
Iyer, V.M.
(2007), “Auditors’ identification with their clients and its effect on auditors’ objectivity”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 1-24.
4. Bell, T.B.
,
Landsman, W.R.
and
Shackelford, D.A.
(2001), “Auditors’ perceived business risk and audit fees: analysis and evidence”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 35-43.
5. Blay, A.D.
and
Geiger, M.A.
(2013), “Auditor fees and auditor independence: evidence from going-concern reporting decisions”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 579-606.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献