Auditors' Identification with Their Clients and Its Effect on Auditors' Objectivity

Author:

Bamber E. Michael1,Iyer Venkataraman M.2

Affiliation:

1. Professor at the University of Georgia at Greensboro.

2. Associate Professor at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

Abstract

This study empirically models auditors' relationships with their clients. The Independence Standards Board (ISB 2000) identified auditors' familiarity with the client as one of five threats to auditor independence. Yet familiarity with the client is necessary for auditors to understand the client well enough to plan and perform an effective and efficient audit. We introduce a theory-based measure of the extent to which auditors identify with a client, which we then use to directly measure auditors' attachment to the client and the threat of this attachment to auditors' objectivity. The responses of 252 practicing auditors support our theoretical predictions. Specifically, we find that auditors do identify with their clients and that auditors who identify more with a client are more likely to acquiesce to the client-preferred position. On the other hand, more experienced auditors and auditors who exhibit higher levels of professional identification are less likely to acquiesce to the client's position.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference80 articles.

1. Social Indentity And The Problem of Loyalty In Knowledge-Intensive Companies

2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1992. Statement of Position Regarding Mandatory Rotation of Audit Firms of Publicly Held Companies. New York, NY: AICPA.

3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2005a. AICPA Professional Standards. Section AU311 Planning and Supervision. New York, NY: AICPA.

4. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2005b. Code of Professional Conduct. New York, NY: AICPA.

Cited by 220 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3