A meta-analysis approach for determinants of effective factors on audit quality

Author:

Salehi Mahdi,Fakhri Mahmoudi Mohamad Reza,Daemi Gah Ali

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to demonstrate a deeper understanding about the reasons behind difference in previous studies’ results in the field of audit quality determinants.Design/methodology/approachA meta-analysis method is employed in which 52 studies including 40 international studies from authentic scientific articles during the year 2000–2015 and 12 national studies out of authentic national scientific articles from 2001 to 2015 are taken to account as sample studies. Audit firm size, auditor tenure and auditor specialization are set as independent variables and audit quality is the only dependent variable in the current paper.FindingsThe results indicate that audit firm size and auditor specialization are positively associated with audit quality. In other words, contracting with larger audit firm and specialized auditor results in delivering higher quality audit services.Originality/valueThe current study is the first study to be conducted in the field of audit quality determinants. The results may be beneficial both for standard setters as well practitioners in a way that it provides evidence that contributes to basis policy and audit-standard makers about domination and determinants of audit quality.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Development,Accounting

Reference150 articles.

1. Audit firm tenure, audit firm size and audit quality;Global Journal of Business and Social Science Review,2014

2. Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve accounting quality?;Preliminary Evidence, Contemporary Accounting Research,2013

3. Audit firm industry specialization and the audit report lag;Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation,2011

4. Alareeni, B. (2017), “The association between audit firm characteristics and audit quality: a meta-analysis”, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2952836

5. Can big 4 versus non-big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics?;The Accounting Review,2011

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3