Author:
Yogeshwaran Gayathri,Perera B.A.K.S.,Ariyachandra M.R. Mahendrini Fernando
Abstract
PurposeQuantity surveying education in Sri Lanka (SL) presently does not appear to be catering to the industry needs indicating that it may not be up to the expected standard. Hence, the purpose of this study is to identify the gap between the competencies of graduate quantity surveyors (QSs) and the competencies that industry in SL expects from them.Design/methodology/approachA hybrid approach was used, consisting of desk reviews, expert interviews and a questionnaire survey. A comparative analysis identifying differences between two competency levels was carried out.FindingsAnalysis reveals that competencies of graduate QSs in areas of cost planning, strategic planning, risk management, value management, life cycle cost analysis, sustainability, surveying and levelling, research and development, building surveying and business management are at levels higher than industry needs. However, majority of competencies are at levels lower than industry expectations.Research limitations/implicationsThis research was focused only on competencies of QSs who have successfully completed a quantity surveying degree programme accredited by Institute of QSs SL, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, Australian Institute of QSs and Pacific Association of QSs. It excluded non-graduates’ competencies as they gain competencies only through work experience.Practical implicationsThis study revealed the need for designing quantity surveying degree programmes to cater to industry needs to ensure that graduates from these programmes are acceptable to the industry.Originality/valueThis study made an original contribution to knowledge by identifying the gap that currently exists between industry needs and programme outcomes of quantity surveying degree programmes, which could be invaluable when improving quantity surveying education in SL.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference56 articles.
1. Thematic analysis: a critical review of its process and evaluation,2012
2. National competency standards for quantity surveyors – construction economists;Australian Institute of Quantity Surveyors (AIQS),2012
3. Australian Institute of Quantity Surveyors (AIQS) (2015), “Membership centre”, available at: www.aiqs.com.au/imis/AIQS_Website/Membership_Centre/Member_Grade/AIQS_Website/Public/Membership_information/Member_Grade.aspx?hkey=dd88d2c8-6f1e-4ee8-90ca-67a99c50c32d (accessed 2 July 2016).
4. National competency standards for quantity surveyors – construction economists;Australian Institute of Quantity Surveyors (AIQS),1997
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献