Preparing Property Graduates for the Digital Age: Challenges and Strategies from the Perspective of Australian Property Educators

Author:

Abidoye Rotimi Boluwatife1ORCID,Ahiadu Albert Agbeko1,Bangura Mustapha2ORCID,Adilieme Chibuikem Michael1ORCID,Oyedokun Tunbosun Biodun3ORCID,Alamoudi Abood Khaled1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Built Environment, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

2. School of Built Environment, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia

3. School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RS, UK

Abstract

The work readiness of property graduates is the subject of global discourse and is an increasingly critical gap as employers demand professionals with competencies in their fundamental roles and digital technologies. Although these issues have been explored from the perspectives of students, graduates, and employers, the insights of property academics remain unexplored. As such, this study delved into the challenges encountered by property academics in Australia concerning the training of property graduates for the digital age, as well as the efficacy of strategies used to achieve this. The opinions of 22 property academics were gathered through an online questionnaire survey and analysed through mean scores, relative importance index (RII), and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The profile of respondents suggests that approximately half of them have no more than five years of industry experience, and only 54.5% currently engage with the industry. The most significant challenges include limited funding to procure bespoke software and insufficient time to achieve digital competency. Furthermore, academics cited limited support from the universities as a key challenge, but rated curriculum rigidity as non-pertinent. Regarding strategies, retraining academics for digital proficiency, increased technical support from universities, adopting active learning, and revising curricula to incorporate digital technology are critical. Collaboration with industry partners and increased funding for software procurement also emerged as key external factors. Variations in these perceptions also suggest that older academics are less receptive towards retraining, academics with more industry experience believe that a restructuring of the curricula is required, and smaller institutions require more funding and industry support. The core themes of the proposed strategies also indicate that holistic curricula integration is required to incorporate the perspectives of all stakeholders. Practically, these findings underscore the pivotal role of academics in bridging the skills gap and the interconnected roles of graduates, universities, and industry partners.

Funder

UNSW Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture Research Support Scheme

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference82 articles.

1. Baum, A. (2009). Commercial Real Estate Investment, Routledge. [2nd ed.].

2. Boyd, T. (2000). Stakeholder Impact on Property Education Programs, Queensland University of Technology.

3. One and the Same? A Systematic Literature Review of Residential Property Investor Types;J. Plan. Lit.,2020

4. Exploring Gaps between Real Estate Curriculum and Industry Needs: A Mapping Exercise;Amidu;Pac. Rim Prop. Res. J.,2018

5. Abidoye, R., Lim, B.T.H., Lin, Y.C., and Ma, J. (2022). Equipping Property Graduates for the Digital Age. Sustainability, 14.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3