Multi‐robot team formation control in the GUARDIANS project
Author:
Saez‐Pons Joan,Alboul Lyuba,Penders Jacques,Nomdedeu Leo
Abstract
PurposeThe Group of Unmanned Assistant Robots Deployed in Aggregative Navigation by Scent (GUARDIANS) multi‐robot team is to be deployed in a large warehouse in smoke. The team is to assist firefighters search the warehouse in the event or danger of a fire. The large dimensions of the environment together with development of smoke which drastically reduces visibility, represent major challenges for search and rescue operations. The GUARDIANS robots act alongside a firefighter and guide and accompany the firefighters on the site while indicating possible obstacles and the locations of danger and maintain communications links. The purpose of this paper is to focus on basic navigation behaviours of multi‐robot or human‐robot teams, which have to be achieved without central and on‐line control in both categories of GUARDIANS robots' tasks.Design/methodology/approachIn order to fulfill the aforementioned tasks, the robots need to be able to perform certain behaviours. Among the basic behaviours are capabilities to stay together as a group, that is, generate a formation and navigate while keeping this formation. The control model used to generate these behaviours is based on the so‐called social potential field framework, which the authors adapt to the specific tasks required for the GUARDIANS scenario. All tasks can be achieved without central control, and some of the behaviours can be performed without explicit communication between the robots.FindingsThe GUARDIANS environment requires flexible formations of the robot team: the formation has to adapt itself to the circumstances. Thus, the application has forced the concept of a formation to be re‐defined. Using the graph‐theoretic terminology, it can be said that a formation may be stretched out as a path or be compact as a star or wheel. The developed behaviours have been implemented in simulation environments as well as on real ERA‐MOBI robots commonly referred to as Erratics. Advantages and shortcomings of the model, based on the simulations as well as on the implementation with a team of Erratics are discussed.Originality/valueThis paper discusses the concept of a robot formation in the context of a real world application of a robot team (Swarm).
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference54 articles.
1. Alboul, L., Saez‐Pons, J. and Penders, J. (2008), “Mixed human‐robot team navigation in the Guardians project”, International Workshop on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics (SSRR 2008), pp. 95‐101. 2. Alboul, L., Saez‐Pons, J., Penders, J. and Nomdedeu, L. (2009), “Challenges of the multi‐robot team in the Guardians project”, in Xie, M., Xiong, Y., Xiong, C., Liu, H. and Hu, Z. (Eds), Intelligent Robotics and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5928, Springer, Berlin, pp. 112‐25. 3. Alboul, L., Abdul‐Rahman, H., Haynes, P., Penders, J. and Tharin, J. (2010), “Guardians multi‐robot team as a self‐organising system”, paper presented at International Workshop on Robotics for Risky Interventions and Environmental Surveillance (RISE), Sheffield, 20‐21 January. 4. Asada, M., Uchibe, E. and Hosoda, K. (1999), “Cooperative behavior acquisition for mobile robots in dynamically changing real worlds via vision‐based reinforcement learning and development”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 110 No. 2, pp. 275‐92. 5. Bachmayer, R. and Leonard, N.E. (2002), “Vehicle networks for gradient descent in a sampled environment”, Proceedings of 41st IEEE CDC, Las Vegas, NV, December, pp. 112‐17.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|