Author:
McCarthy Alma M.,Garavan Thomas N.
Abstract
360° feedback processes have gained popularity as a performance management and career development tool in contemporary organisations. This monograph explores the nature of 360° feedback, investigates the factors which have influenced its emergence and contrasts it with more traditional performance management processes used by organisations. It specifically identifies the benefits and problems associated with 360° feedback in the context of management of performance and employee career development. The monograph considers the issues surrounding different sources of feedback, i.e. peer, subordinate and self. The monograph concludes with a discussion of the issues pertaining to the use of multi‐rater feedback as a tool for performance improvement and career development.
Subject
Development,General Business, Management and Accounting,Education
Reference161 articles.
1. Albright, M. and Levy, P. (1995), “The effects of source credibility and performance rating discrepancy on reactions to multiple raters”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 577‐600.
2. Ashkenas, R., Ulrich, D., Jick, T. and Kerr, S. (1995), The Boundaryless Organization, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.
3. Atwater, L. and Waldman, D. (1998), “Accountability in 360° feedback”, HR Magazine, Vol. 43 No. 6, May, pp. 96‐102.
4. Atwater, L., Roush, P. and Fischthal, A. (1995), “The influence of upward feedback on self‐ and follower ratings of leadership”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 48 No. 1, Spring, pp. 35‐59.
5. Atwater, L., Waldman, D., Atwater, D. and Cartier, P. (2000), “An upward feedback field experiment: supervisors’ cynicism, follow‐up and commitment to subordinatess”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 53 No. 2, Summer, pp. 275‐97.
Cited by
56 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献