An examination of the views of key stakeholders on the development of learning spaces at a regional university

Author:

Todhunter Barrie James

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the degree of alignment between the views of key stakeholders on the development of learning spaces in a new teaching and learning building at a satellite campus of a regional university. Design/methodology/approach – Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with six stakeholders including senior executives, technical staff, academic staff and students. The interviews were transcribed and the data analysed to identify common and differing themes on the part of the respective interviewees in relation to learning spaces in general, and in relation to the new teaching and learning building in particular. Findings – A comprehensive framework should be articulated by the university for its theme of personalised learning so that decisions can be made at lower levels of the university to operationalise the theme across academic and administrative functions. A clear definition of the blended learning pedagogy, which is proposed to be implemented as part of the personalised learning theme, should be articulated. The implications of the blended learning pedagogy for the design of learning spaces should be identified and clear design guidelines for learning spaces should be articulated. Learning spaces in the new building should be reviewed to achieve alignment with the personalised learning framework and the guidelines for learning spaces. Research limitations/implications – As this is a preliminary study with a small number of participants, a qualitative approach was taken to identify the indicative views of representatives of key stakeholders. The findings relate specifically to the context of this study at a regional Australian university. Originality/value – This paper provides valuable insights into how a university’s philosophy on learning spaces manifests itself through creation and implementation of high-level policy and how that is interpreted and actioned by a range of stakeholders across campuses, including staff and students.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference41 articles.

1. Bomsdorf, B. (2005), “Adaptation of learning spaces: supporting ubiquitous learning in higher distance education”, Mobile Computing and Ambient Intelligence: The Challenge of Multimedia , University of Hagen, Dagstuhl.

2. Brown, M. (2009), “Inversions”, EDUCAUSE Review , Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 64-70.

3. Chang, R.L. , Stern, L. , Sondergaard, H. and Hadgraft, R. (2015), “Places for learning engineering: a preliminary report on informal learning spacesed”, Research in Engineering Education Symposium , Palm Cove, Queensland.

4. Crisp, G. (2012), “Assessment in virtual learning spaces”, Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces in Higher Education: Concepts for the Modern Learning Environment , IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp. 199-218.

5. Fleming, D. and Storr, J. (1999), “The impact of lecture theatre design on learning experience”, Facilities , Vol. 17 Nos 7/8, pp. 231-236.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3