A systematic literature review exploring the psychosocial aspects of palliative care provision for incarcerated persons: a human rights perspective

Author:

Johns Lise,Weightman Stacey,Blackburn Pippa,McAuliffe Donna

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore the psychosocial aspects of palliative care provision for incarcerated persons drawing on a human rights perspective. Design/methodology/approach Seven databases were searched to identify empirical studies published from 2010 to 2020. Articles included were qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, written in English and with westernised health/prison settings, with a key focus on the psychosocial aspects of palliative care provision and human rights. The quality of the articles was appraised using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool (2018). Findings The results from 26 articles revealed multiple models of care, with the US prison hospice program depicted as optimal, because of the use of trained incarcerated caregivers, working as aides to the interprofessional team. The bereavement needs of caregivers were highlighted. The barriers to adequate psychosocial care were negative public discourse, prison processes and resources, provider attitudes and the incarcerated person’s level of knowledge and trust. Identified facilitators were related to incarcerated persons’ caregiving programs, a sense of purpose and visitation leniency. Human rights principles were identified in studies that featured compassionate release and advance care planning. Research limitations/implications There is inconsistency in the literature regarding what constitutes psychosocial care, which meant that the authors needed to draw on multiple literature sources to formulate a definition. Additionally, the review only included studies written in English, meaning some high-quality studies could have been missed. The articles that conducted interviews with incarcerated individuals were undertaken in male prisons only and not female prisons. Practical implications Understanding the importance of psychosocial care for incarcerated persons with a life-limiting illness requires a shift in negative public discourse and the need for a stronger human rights focus. Some countries, such as the USA and UK, are achieving effective outcomes; however, countries such as Australia are yet to contribute to this knowledge base. Originality/value If palliative care is a human right, then its philosophy should be considered in its entirety, with the inclusion of psychosocial care.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Professions (miscellaneous)

Reference54 articles.

1. Age UK (2019), “Ageing prison population inquiry. (report no. 1619)”, available at: www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/reports-and-publications/consultation-responses-and-submissions/care-support/justice_committee_ageing_prison_population_inquiry_submission_october2019.pdf (accessed 20 August 2020).

2. Australian Healthcare Associates (2019), “Exploratory analysis of barriers of palliative care- issues report on people who are incarcerated”, available at: www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/exploratory-analysis-of-barriers-to-palliative-care-issues-report-on-people-who-are-incarcerated (accessed 20 August 2020).

3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW] (2014), “Prisoner health services in Australia 2012. (bulletin no. 123)”, available at: www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/b80b7d02-7238-4fc1-96ed-742f38bb9844/17454.pdf.aspx?inline=true (accessed 1 November 2020).

4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW] (2019), “The health of Australia’s prisoners 2018”, available at: www.aihw.gov.au/reports/prisoners/health-australia-prisoners-2018/contents/table-of-contents (accessed 1 November 2020).

5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW] (2020), “Health of prisoners”, available at: www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/health-of-prisoners (accessed 12 December 2020).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3