Perceptions and experiences of clinicians and correctional officers facilitating palliative care for people in prison: A systematic review and meta-synthesis

Author:

Schaefer Isabelle1ORCID,Panozzo Stacey23ORCID,DiGiacomo Michelle1,Heneka Nicole4,Phillips Jane L.15

Affiliation:

1. University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

2. St Vincent’s Health Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

3. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

4. University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia

5. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Abstract

Background: As the number of people ageing in prison with complex healthcare needs continues to increase, so does the need for palliative care in the restrictive prison context. Palliative care for people in prison is facilitated by correctional officers, and prison- and hospital-based clinicians. A collective analysis of existing research to identify common experiences of these stakeholders globally has not been completed. Aim: To explore the perceptions and experiences of correctional officers and prison- and hospital-based clinicians who facilitate palliative care for people in prison. Design: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Data sources: Keywords and subject headings related to palliative care and prisons were used to search seven databases with no time limitations. Peer-reviewed research in English, containing qualitative data from stakeholders facilitating palliative care for people in prison were included, and appraised using the CASP tool. Results: Two analytical themes emerged: (i) a prison lens on a palliative approach and (ii) coping complexities. Palliative care is ‘translated’ into the prison setting according to security and environmental constraints. Stakeholders experienced ethical, personal and professional difficulties, because prison-based palliative care did not align with community norms. Ambiguous policy and expectations regarding prioritising care needs and balancing custodial rules led to role stress. Conclusions: Providing palliative care for people in prison is complex and impacts stakeholders and people in prison with palliative care needs. Supporting person-centred care through a multi-service approach, stakeholder education and standards will improve the quality and accessibility of care.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference80 articles.

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health and ageing of Australia’s prisoners 2018. Cat. No. PHE 269, 2020. Canberra: AIHW. https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/1656721b-e93e-42f2-8f2c-3d6fafe647e6/aihw-phe-269.pdf.aspx?inline=true#:~:text=Prisoners%20aged%2065%20and%20over,from%20519%20to%20810%20prisoners.

2. Addressing the Aging Crisis in U.S. Criminal Justice Health Care

3. Dying for a change: a systematic review of compassionate release policies

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3